盤點史上最奇葩的論文退稿理由，心疼地抱住寄幾
來源：知社學術圈（微信號：zhishexueshuquan）
本文已獲得原創授權
前幾天發了小編論文被拒的文案，發現大家都很有共鳴。于是又讓小編想起兩三年前有次論文被拒，寫的退稿理由是“請把一作改為二作”，身為一作的小編微微一笑，“你猜我改不改？”
想來大家一定也遇到過不少神奇的退稿理由，就做了一個小小的盤點，如有雷同，都是緣分。
“
1. I was really looking forward to reading this manu, however this enthusiasm soon waned.
——本來興高采烈，你的論文像是一盆冰水淋頭潑下。
”
“
2. While this study represents a substantial amount of work, it is not all that clear why the work was done.
——雖然論文里顯示你做了很多很多工作，可這不是一個工作日記。
”
“
3. I wish I could explain what is the purpose of the manu.
——我的智商還不足以理解你論文的深意。
”
“
4. Authors wanted to make title catchy but actually finished trivial title, a la ‘Daily mail’
——想取個好標題是對的，但是請先多讀點書。
”
“
5. However I deplore the fact that this paper has been created at all.
——這個論文就不該被寫出來。
”
“
6. So many electrons worked so very very hard on this paper.
——整個研究工作只有電子們很努力。
”
“
7. You are trying to do too much and end up accomplishing too little. It is a collection of good ideas that do not add up to or advance to any meaningful conclusion.
——你想做的太多了但實際做的卻很少�？茖W不是空想家的世界。
”
“
8. The discussion is inappropriate and the new content is generally poorly written。
——一派胡言毫無新意氣死老夫。
”
“
9. The team has generated the kind of gaudy, brobdignagian dataset that makes it such a curious and exciting time.
——癩蛤蟆穿上花衣服還是癩蛤蟆。
”
“
10. It seems that the author is simply engaged in proprietary phrase coining – advancing a new term for a well-researched phenomenon.
——看來，作者是專有短語創造工作者 - 為一些深刻的現象提出新的術語。
”
“
11. Moreover, it is unclear whether the effect is sufficiently important to warrant replication.
——我也不知道文章的結論有沒有意義，那就先拒了你。
”
“
12. It is worth saying that I am not convinced that you contribute to the evidence base in this paper.
——我才不信你做過這些工作呢，哼
”
“
13. That’s not how science is done.
——你研究的可能是玄學。
”
“
14. The authors conclusions not only contradict their own data but also the laws of thermodynamics.
——旁友，聽說過永動機嗎？
”
“
15. I really don’t like to be harsh in my reviews, but…
——“可以說臟話嗎？”
——“不行。”
——“那沒事了。”
”
“
16. While I think there is good reason to have performed this work, it does make for unexciting reading.
——語文是體育老師教的？
”
“
17. Line 156-160; this is the only correct, sensible and interesting finding of the paper.
——全篇幾萬字只有四行不是瞎扯蛋。
”
“
18. It feels a little bit like someone wanting to run a series of statistics.
——你企圖成為一臺計算機嗎？
”
“
19. Are the “10 random reps" chosen at random?
——你這十個隨機選取對象是抓鬮的嗎？
”
“
20. The authors need to add a level of puzzlement to their interpretations.
——你知道為什么《蒙娜麗莎》賣的比《沉睡的維納斯》貴嗎？
”
“
21. One wonders whether the analysis was an exercise in using a cannon to open an unlocked door.
——你的分析過程簡直是用一門大炮轟開一扇沒鎖的門。
”
“
22. This work is only a maths game.
——只有我七歲的兒子有資格讓我跟他玩數學游戲。
”
“
23. Overall, I think this manu is a waste of time.
——寫這個論文不如去幫媽媽多做點家務。
”
“
24. Moreover, it is very difficult to see the actual contribution this manu will have.
——What’s the shit???
